I had designed some parts, and after re-evaluating them in Stress Analysis, I realized one needed to be beefed up…substantially. Thanks to Shakeel Mizra’s class at AU 2009, I didn’t get too far before I realized it.
I added some thickness that was managed by the skeleton, so all the associated parts adapted properly (and without an error); there’s a shocker. Then I added some reinforcement and cut out recesses in the housing to accommodate these. This was not completely managed in the skeleton, so it hurt my feelings a bit, but nothing I couldn’t get over. After I began smoothing the reinforcements into the solid, the Fillet features got a bit large. This is fine for the part getting reinforced, but on the receiving part, those complex Fillets can come back to haunt you.
Here they did. I realized that there was a conflict. But the question is, what is a good way to see it? If I could just set my eyes on it, I could better evaluate the steps to fix it.
Here is what I did. Nothing new or exciting, just some down to earth tricks of the trade.
- I sliced the assembly down the rotating axis.
- Then applied a dark color to the receiving part
- Now a translucent opposing color to the part being inserted
- move the inserted component
Now we move the part through its range using manual drag, or even a slow angular constraint drive. Pretty soon the problem sticks out like a sore thumb. I just added some additional material removal around the receiving well, and the overlap is gone.